Motor
Skills Performance of Children Who Are Deaf
December
1999
The Study
Professors Gail Dummer and John Haubenstricker of
the Department of Kinesiology, and David Stewart,
professor in the Department of Counseling,
Educational Psychology and Special Education,
assessed the motor skills of children who are
deaf. They then compared the performance of those
children with reference data for young people who
can hear.
The Findings
The researchers assessed the motor skills of 91
girls and 110 boys from 4 to 18 years of age.
Using the Test of Gross Motor Development (run,
gallop, hop, leap, horizontal jump, skip and
slide) and five object-control skills (two-hand
strike, stationary bounce, catch, kick, and
overhead throw), the researchers found that
children aged 4-10 who are deaf scored lower than
same-aged children who could hear at all but one
age level. The 4-year-old children who were deaf
performed better. (There were no reference data
for older individuals from ages 11 to 18.) The
data they collected also suggests that children
who are deaf seem to lag behind by 1 to 3 years
in the acquisition of object-control skills like
catching, throwing and striking. As a whole,
children who were deaf acquired skills in
running, sliding and galloping at younger ages;
skill in hopping and jumping at the same age, and
skill in skipping and leaping at later ages. The
researchers found that generally the difference
in performance levels at any given age level were
relatively small.
What It Means
to You
The lower levels of performance of children who
could not hear at same age levels and on same
skills may indicate that the focus of instruction
did not adequately emphasize development in these
skills. It appears children who are deaf could
benefit from improvement in the ways or the
extent to which skills are taught in physical
education classes.
More
Information
Dummer, G.M., Haubenstricker, J.L, Stewart, D.A.
(1996). Motor skills performances of children who
are deaf. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,
13, 400-414.
<back
to 1999 ed-Research Reports
|