The
New Accountability, Student Failure and Teachers' Work in Urban High
Schools
November 20, 2003
The Study
When school districts promote new accountability policies, what is
the impact on teachers and their teaching practices? Assistant
Professor Dorothea Anagnostopoulos conducted this study with that
question in mind. Her research focused on English teachers in two
Chicago high schools and how they were affected by changing district
policies that sought to decrease student failure and dropout rates
and increase standardized test scores.
The Findings
Educational accountability brings a sense of urgency to the problem
of school failure, particularly in urban high schools. A key goal of
accountability policies is to ensure that all students master core
academic content. Achieving this goal requires teachers in urban
high schools to alter their practices in ways that enable them to
remedy the learning difficulties that contribute to student failure.
This study identified several possible consequences of teachers’
responses to accountability policies and student failure in urban
high schools. Through the analyses of interview and classroom
observation data, Anagnostopoulos found that teachers’ responses to
district policies related to the degree to which teachers perceived
the policies as threats to their professional autonomy. Teachers
responded to testing policies by allocating significant classroom
time to “teaching to the tests” but employed several defensive
strategies in response to policies aimed at lowering course failure
rates. These strategies may have reduced failure rates but did not
remedy student failure. Anagnostopoulos noted that as new
accountability tactics continue to dominate educational policy,
educators need to understand how and why some teachers in urban high
schools eschew disengaging practices. A handful of teachers in this
study accepted responsibility for their students’ academic failure,
and developed instructional practices aimed at addressing students’
learning problems. “We need to know more about how these teachers
have developed and maintained these practices,“ she concluded, “how
they can serve as models for their colleagues, and what policies
will best support their leadership.”
What It Means to You
How are teachers held accountable for student failure in your
district? Have educators felt more pressure to produce better test
scores and lower dropout rates? Do favorable results in your
district mean students are learning more, or that teachers are
modifying their standards and lessons to keep pace with
expectations?
For More Information
Anagnostopoulos, D. (2003). “The New Accountability, Student Failure
and Teachers’ Work in Urban High Schools.” Educational Policy (17)3,
291-316.
< back to 2003 ed-research reports
|