Resisting
Educational Standards
February 15,
2003
The
Study
In
this article in Phi Delta Kappan, Professor David Labaree examines
the issue of educational standards, specifically why Americans have
so vigorously resisted educational standards over the years.
The
Findings
The
history of resistance to educational standards, Labaree writes,
suggests that there are three features that have made standards
such a hard sell: a commitment to local control of schools, a commitment
to expansion of educational opportunity, and a commitment to form
over substance in the way we think about educational accomplishment.
In terms of local control, Labaree notes that given the nation's
long history of opposition to government interference in local affairs,
"it is not surprising that efforts to set educational standards
at the national or state level have not proceeded very far." The
second factor, expanding educational opportunities, has stifled
standards because the push has been to increase the quantity of
access to schooling rather than to improve the quality of learning.
The final major factor that has caused trouble for educational standards
has been America's longstanding emphasis on measuring educational
achievement rather than on academic performance. "That is, we measure
success by the amount of time we spend sitting in classrooms --
placing ourselves at risk of getting an education -- rather than
by the amount of knowledge and skill that we actually acquire."
The root of problem, in Labaree's view, is the ascendant vision
of American public education as a private good -- not a public one.
This consumer-oriented view of education works against educational
standards. "[W]e don't want any system of standards that might restrict
access to the educational goods our children might need in order
to get ahead or stay ahead. Instead, we want a system like the current
one, which allows our children to gain a competitive advantage over
other people's children. The last thing we think we need is a standards
effort that equalizes educational achievement and therefore puts
my child and yours on an equal footing."
What
It Means to You
Have
standards-based reforms been difficult to implement in your district?
Might Labaree's analysis document some of the reasons that efforts
to implement standards have yielded little in the way of results?
Has the emphasis in your district been to foster greater educational
opportunities or improve the quality of teaching and learning?
For
More Information
Labaree,
D.F. (2000). Resisting educational standards. Phi Delta Kappan,
82(1), 28-33.
< back to 2003 ed-research reports
|