Small Research Grant Competition

MSU/Spencer Research Training Grant Program

Rating Form for Proposal Reviewers

 

Applicant Name:_________________________________            Reviewer:_____________________

 

Applicant’s Doctoral Program:_______________________  Year 1st Enrolled in Program:_____

 

Grant Requested ($500-$1,000):_____________      Research for:  Dissertation:____  Other____

 

Proposal Meets Basic Criteria for Award (check):

            Applicant has not received an MSU/Spencer fellowship                               ____

            Applicant does not currently have a multi-year fellowship                           ____

            Project is not being funded by a research grant                                              ____

            Applicant has not received a previous RTG small research grant                  ____

            Research relates to teaching and learning                                                        ____

 

The work paid for by this grant will provide

significant added value to the research project:

                        Not Significant                                                                    Very  Significant

 

                                                1                      2                      3                      4                      5

            Comments:

 

 

 

The analytical value of this project (quality of conceptualization,

potential contribution to the field, potential for developing

the student’s research agenda):

                                Low                                                                                         High

 

                                                1                      2                      3                      4                      5

            Comments:

 

 

 

The educational value of this project for the student

(degree to which it will provide opportunity to develop

research agenda and/or acquire research skills)

                                Low                                                                                         High

 

                                                1                      2                      3                      4                      5

            Comments:

 

 

 

Rank of proposal:_________