On
the nature of Teaching and Teacher Education
April 20, 2001
The Article
David Labaree, professor in the Department of Teacher
Education, examines an old and enduring problem in the long history
of trying to create an effective and respected system for preparing
teachers: that teaching is an enormously difficult job that looks
easy.
Discussion
Labaree explores the roots of the gap between the reality
and the perception of learning to teach by first spelling out some
of the characteristics of teaching that make it such a difficult
form of professional practice. He then examines key elements in the
nature of teaching that make the process of becoming a teacher seem
so uncomplicated. Among the factors Labaree highlights as making
teaching such a difficult practice is the fact that students must be
willing to learn what the teacher is teaching, and students are only
present in the classroom because they are compelled to be there.
Teaching, unlike other professions, also requires teachers to
actually manage an emotional relationship with students but there is
no guidebook for how to accomplish this. “Like other practioners
in the professions of human improvement, teachers have to work
things out on their own, without being able to fall back on
standards of acceptable professional practice such as those that
guide lawyers, doctors, and accountants.” Then there is the
problem of chronic uncertainty about the effectiveness of teaching.
“The technology of teaching,” Labaree writes, “is anything but
certain, and teachers must learn to live with chronic uncertainty as
an essential component at their professional practice.” Despite
the difficulties inherent in teaching, the profession is generally
seen to be relatively easy even among teacher candidates. The
reasons are many. Labaree cites such factors as the apprenticeship
of observation, which means that prospective teachers have spent a
great deal of time as students observing teachers ply their trade.
“Their apprenticeship of observation shows them a lot about what
teachers do but almost nothing about why they do it.” Another
factor is the perception that the substantive skills and knowledge
that teachers possess are thoroughly ordinary. An additional factor
is that a good teacher is in the business of making himself or
herself unnecessary, “of empowering learners to learn without the
teacher’s help.” That
is very different, Labaree writes, from lawyers or doctors, who
guard or ‘mystify’ their knowledge. For Labaree, all these
factors help explain why teaching and learning to teach look easy.
“Teachers and teacher educators put themselves in positions that
diminish their own status and power in order to enhance the capacity
and independence of their students.
This distinctive mode of professional practice helps explain
much of the disdain that both professions must endure, but at the
same time this quixotic selflessness also endows teachers and
teacher educators with just a hint of frayed nobility.”
For More Information
Labaree, D. F. (2000). On the nature of teaching and
teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 3(51),
228-231.
< back to 2001 ed-research reports
|